Monday, November 15, 2010

Hunter Freeman - Heroes on Hold Images

The Purdue Alumus November issue had an article about the future of the space program and had these great images that went well with the overall theme/article title of "Heroes on Hold".




Effects of reorganizations

Article on effects of reorganizations

As a result, for a while any individual who would like to step on the gas pedal is basically frozen while everybody tries to figure out how to do his or her job. During that time, most people’s results will go downhill. That’s because the issues that are now most important to my client, and others around her, are:

  1. Are the changes finished? Are there more to come? Who’s next?
  2. “If I work for her and you report to him, who can make the final decision?”
  3. “Does this mean I have to travel by plane twice a month for the department meeting? If I don’t, will I be able to get as much out of a meeting just by dialing in?”
  4. “What does this mean for me and my career path? Do I really want to stay here?”

I estimate that it will take four months before this group gets back to business as usual. It’s very unlikely that results will improve during this period. On the other hand, it’s very likely that fear and loathing will increase.

Next time someone brings up the idea of some structural changes at your place, keep this in mind. And remember these two rules of management:

  1. Really great leaders can make any organizational chart work effectively. (Poor leaders rarely improve results with an organizational change.)
  2. Pros know that people perform best when they are confident about their own situation, so those bosses do what they can to ensure stability. (Weak bosses whine that they can’t get things done because of the org chart

Difference between Lean and Six Sigma

Repost from this site

Many professionals ask "What is Lean?", some ask "What is Six Sigma?", and of course still others ask "What is Lean Six Sigma?" As it turns out, these approaches address similar problem sets but attack them differently. Here is a look at what they are, the difference, the similarities, and the synergies.

The difference between Lean and Six Sigma can be summarized as follows:

Six Sigma = Reduced process variation
Lean = Improved process flow

Let's take a look at each.

What is "Lean"?
In the practice of "Lean", the focus is on breaking down processes to the "bare bone essentials", hence the name "lean". The Lean approach to waste is that "Non-value added is waste". Hence, the proactice of Lean has as its central goal to segregate waste from value in processes, and eliminate the waste and non-value added.

The typical method for practicing Lean is to do the following:

1. Identify Value
2. Define Value Stream
3. Determine Flow
4. Define Pull
5. Improve Process

The focus of Lean is on Process flow. Tools used for the practice of Lean are oriented to visualization, and include tools like Microsoft Visio.

What is Six Sigma?

In the Six Sigma approach, the view on waste is that "Variation is waste".

In practicing Six Sigma, the DMAIC method is used:

1. Define
2. Measure
3. Analyze
4. Improve
5. Control

Six Sigma is a "Problem focused" methodology, and the primary toolset of Six Sigma is Math and Statistics.

The Conflict Between Lean and Six Sigma
There is a "battle" within the Lean and Six Sigma professional communities among many who think their respective way is better and superior. In general, the Six Sigma side claims to be technically superior and that reducing variation gets to the root of the problem. The Lean side argues that basic flowcharting is more often than not all that is needed to produce high impact improvements.

This all has a "territorial" feel about it among consultants and aficionados of each approach or methodology. However, we know that tools are only a means to and end, and that we need to match the tool to the job. Such arguments and territorialism often arise when professionals are attached to the tool, and in essence are a "solution in search of a problem", and want to make sure their solution is chosen more often.

Does the Controversy Matter?
Tough times typically mean LEAN times, and these are tough time economically around the world. It seems that under those conditions, it would be more appropriate to focus on the challenge at hand and use the best tool(s) for the job. The controversy matters little, in my opinion.

Six Sigma and Lean go together hand in hand, although they often are differentiated. Despite any distinctions, the two go very well together and complement one another. For example, it could be a very logical approach to focus on Lean to achieve improved process flow, and at the same time develop a deeper understanding of the process. If more work is needed, Six Sigma could be used to reduce process variation. It seems very logical that they can be effectively deployed together.



Read more: http://www.articlesbase.com/business-articles/lean-versus-six-sigma-whats-the-controversy-what-the-difference-595677.html#ixzz15MoiNo4a
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

How to Hone Your BS Detecting Skills

Edited from BNET Article by Jessica Stillman

Idea for a ToastMaster speech.

Succeeding in business is all about accurately analyzing information and then making smart decisions. Falling for BS is antithetical to both. But with the world awash in half-truths, partial distortions, aggrandizing exaggerations and out-and-out lies you’ll have plenty of opportunities to fall prey to other people’s bull. How can you protect yourself from being led astray by their nonsense?

Washington, DC based venture capitalist Don Rainey has penned a post for Business Insider’s War Room offering six suggestions to help you hone you BS detecting abilities. The piece is well worth a read in its entirety, but the basic suggestions are as follows:

  • Determine what serves the speaker’s self-interest. Whenever someone is presenting a point of view, you owe it to yourself to consider how their opinion might correlate to their own self-interest. After all, there must be some reason they have to make the argument to you in the first place. And that reason more likely correlates with their own self-interest than with yours.
  • Question the data. We live in a world of pseudo science, skewed sample sets and anonymous experts. Don’t accept anything as an important truth without first examining the source. Even then - question the underlying assumptions. See Micheal Crit WSJ editorial "Aliens cause Global Warning" and the Drake Equation influence on SETI.
  • Watch for truth qualifying statements. “To tell you the truth” or “Let’s be frank” or “I have to be honest…” are all statements that beg the question – “Are we starting to be honest just now?”
  • Listen for name dropping. Credibility should always be derived from the strength of the argument, known facts and/or the reputation of the person present. If absent prominent people are the backbone of an argument, you should be suspect.
  • Notice confusion in response to logical counterpoints. This type of response is meant to undermine your confidence in the soundness of your counter argument without seeking to specifically or factually oppose the point itself. Watch out for confusion when there should be none.
  • Beware of the obvious. If a conversation provides you with one obvious thought after another, wait for the end of the train of thoughts as it is typically an illogical conclusion. After getting into a “yes…yes… yes…” rhythm, you may easily accept a well placed random conclusion or mistruth.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Using Mendelssohn to teach leadership

From INSEAD http://knowledge.insead.edu/leadership-merck-orchestra-101014.cfm?vid=458
The Merck Orchestra: using Mendelssohn to teach leadership

---- by David Turecamo ----



Credit Beethoven with creating what we know as the modern symphony orchestra. It wasn’t until the 18th and 19th centuries when composers, especially Beethoven, demanded more force and complexity in the execution of their works, that symphony orchestras were born. Ranging in size anywhere from 80 to 100 musicians, a symphony orchestra not only provides a magnificent sound, but an engaging illustration of how leadership works. As pharmaceutical company Merck has discovered, watching an orchestra rehearse is an invaluable lesson in corporate management.


Jon Chilingerian
“A symphony conductor, in many ways, has a great deal of mystique about what they do” says Jon Chilingerian, Adjunct Professor of Organisational Behaviour at INSEAD.

To most audiences the conductor may seem like the ‘maestro,’ an authoritarian leader commanding musicians from his podium. But Wolfgang Heinzel, chief conductor of the Merck Orchestra, says: “We have people from different cultures, different nations, sitting there. They know their instruments, they know how to play their parts, but now I have to bring all that together.”




Typically divided into four sections -- woodwind, brass, strings, and percussion -- each group has a ‘principal’ player: the first violinist, first clarinet and so on. Chilingerian calls them the conductor’s executive team. So striking are the parallels between an orchestra and the structure of a modern corporation that Chilingerian and his colleagues wondered: “What could we learn from watching an orchestra rehearse?”


“We try to help them to detach from their day-to-day leadership and see business from a different perspective,” says Rudiger Janisch, Management Development at Merck.





Concert of Merck’s Philharmonic Orchestra in Wiesbaden
Source: The Merck Group

During a recent week-long symposium, Merck brought 50 of its most promising management heads together. Much of the time was spent in classrooms with case studies and computer models, but when they watched Maestro Heinzel rehearse a piece by Mendelssohn, what they saw was a dynamic illustration of how a corporate leader can not only direct, but inspire.


“I swear to you that every artist, I think everybody in the world, wants to express what he has inside,” said Heinzel to his Merck audience. “And now it’s up to me to take these energies and bring them all together.”


Maestro Heinzel chose the Mendelssohn piece as the orchestra had never played it before as a group. “When they hand out a new piece of music -- a sight read -- what they do is what every good leader has to do: diagnose the situation … the problems. He’s identifying where they need to work.”


Ultimately what Heinzel wants his musicians to understand is they must listen to each other, so that no one can overpower his or her colleague, but should complement the sound. “What I want them to know,” he says, “is that they can do this for the piece, not for me.”


The orchestra was originally comprised entirely of Merck employees but as it became more popular and its schedule placed greater demands on its members, more and more professional musicians were hired. The orchestra is now composed almost entirely of professional musicians. The Merck family actively supports the orchestra, not only to reinforce the family’s values but, according to Janisch, “it helps to motivate people, to show that we are long-term oriented to people and that we are not only committed to business, but business and art.”


“This is a wonderful look at how leaders adapt their style”, says Chilingerian. “We see them not only being directive, guiding, persuading them, they ask questions … and then finally turning the responsibility over to the musicians to play the piece. It’s empowerment.”


Jon Chilingerian is also an Associate Professor of Human Services Management at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University.



First published: October 14, 2010

Last updated: October 14, 2010

DT/SK/MR 10/10

U.S. Leads With Attack Traffic, Not Broadband Speed

U.S. Leads With Attack Traffic, Not Broadband Speed

To run a good meeting, respect your 3s

To run a good meeting, respect your 3s

Friday, October 15, 2010

Why (Programming) Language Doesn't Matter

In terms of selecting a programming language, language doesn't matter.

Roman Jakobson, renowned linguist summed up the differences of languages with this pithy maxim that can be extrapolated to programming languages:
"Languages differ essentially in what they must convey and not in what they may convey"

In terms of a programming language, the what and how they convey an abstract idea is how they differ. It is difference of vocabulary and how easily and nuanced a concept can be conveyed.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Definition of an Expert

Saw this on a recent SSWUG.ORG e-mail (9/10/2010). The true definition of an expert..."someone who can figure it out and get it done."

Like the writer in a the discussion, I too bristle at the label of being called an "expert". I think that I get this label because usually am the only one who doesn't pass the buck to someone else. Rather I take the time to RTFM, look at the bigger picture of what's happening and figure out what needs to get done - then do it.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Networking for People Who Hate Networking

Repost from Baseline Magazine

By Dennis McCafferty on 2010-08-13

Hate the interpersonal aspects of career advancement? Networking for People Who Hate Networking could be the book for you. The fact is that your distaste for networking is far from unusual, but it's holding you back. An IT pro usually can't move up the ladder or get a great, new job on talent and performance alone. The good news is that there are many ways to overcome resistance to networking and emerge as a more engaging, sociable person as a result. In the new book, Networking for People Who Hate Networking: A Field Guide for Introverts, the Overwhelmed, and the Underconnected (Berrett-Koehler/now available), author Devora Zack reveals a host of easy-to-adapt best practices and simple tricks that can help anyone succeed at these events. Zack is president of Only Connect Consulting Inc., which provides coaching to more than 100 clients, including SAIC, AOL, the Smithsonian Institution, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Department of Education. Here are some of the more insights from the book:

1. At least 50 percent of Americans are introverts who are naturally disinclined to pursue traditional, in-person networking.

2. Are You an Introvert?
Introverts are reflective, focused and self-reliant. Extroverts are verbal, expansive and social in nature.

3. Being Introverted is Fine
Introverts are often valued team members. They think before speaking, focus on projects, and don't need a lot of hand-holding.

4. Why Introverts Hate Networking
Introverts need time to trust someone new to them.

5. Why Introverts Hate Networking
Introverts envision potential embarrassments at an event and talk themselves out of attending.

6. Why Introverts Hate Networking
Introverts loathe self-promotion; they feel good work should speak for itself.

7. Better Networking
You don't need to be a big talker to be a good networker. Good listeners are greatly appreciated.

8. Better Networking
Small social blunders can be overcome with a disarming, humorous comment or an e-mail the next day.

9. Better Networking
Show your interest what others do, and they will invest effort in getting to know you.

10. Better Networking
Pre-register and pre-pay for events to keep from backing out at the last minute.

11. Better Networking
Buddy up with someone you trust to encourage you.

12. Better Networking
Volunteer. You may feel better at an event if you have a designated role to perform.

13. Better Networking
Check out the nametag table. You may find a familiar name or company for an easy conversation-starter.

14. Better Networking
Arrive early. It's less intimidating to enter an uncrowded room.

15. Better Networking
Jot down a few notes about people you meet on the back of their business cards for later reference.

16. Better Networking
Relax. You might not feel a connection with everyone you meet. Move on.

Rules You Never Learned in School

Repost from Baseline Magazine

By Dennis McCafferty on 2010-08-17

Building a career takes more than knowledge of programming, project management, or other traditional tech skills. There are any number of people-oriented traits that separate those who continue to move upward and those who remain stuck in neutral year after year—but good luck finding a class to teach these skills. In a new, expanded version of his book, The Rules of Work (FT Press/now available), author Richard Templar explores some of the ways that professionals can make themselves more valuable when they're not focusing on their core duties. It's not simply about getting along with others and sucking up to superiors. It's about presenting yourself as a well-rounded, focused, energized professional, and it's about avoiding classic bad behaviors and casting the most positive impression upon others that you can. You could be the Peyton Manning of IT integration but if you indulge in sloppy personal behaviors, you risk your career. There are 108 rules in Templar's updated book.

Here are 15 that we liked:

1. Underpromise and Overdeliver
Always exceed managers' expectations on project scope, deadlines, etc. and they'll never be disappointed.

2. Carve Out a Niche
Distinguish yourself by becoming a specialist. Elevate yourself as the resident office expert on something useful.

3. Be Careful About Relationships
Office romances are risky. At the very least, tread cautiously and be discreet.

4. Watch Your Language
The wrong words in front of the wrong peer, manager or customer could lead to trouble. 5. Don’t Carry Dead Wood
Helping co-workers is great, but getting taken advantage of is not.

6. Write Well
Business correspondence should be clear, concise and purpose-driven. Check for spelling, grammar, typos.

7. Look Good
Work is not a beauty contest, but your good grooming, eye contact, and smiling help win over team members and bosses.

8. Leave Home at Home
Sharing something about life outside work is nice. Dwelling on domesticproblems is distracting to you and others.

9. Study the Promotion System
Find out how and why people get promoted and follow their example.

10. Be Energetic
Drag yourself into the office, and people will notice.

11. Don’t Complain
Heavy workload? Tight deadlines? Stress? Join the club.

12. Understand the Organization
Followers work in their own little corners. Leaders know how the parts come together.

13. Take Notes
Follow up meetings and conversations with an email about what comes next.

14. Make the Boss Look Good
You get noticed if your manager gets noticed.

15. No “I” in “Team”
Substitute “we” for “I” as often as possible.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Confidence Unbounded by Logic

Had a rough few days at work with some dictated org changes.

I think that they left me sensitive to a couple of posts today about how stupid people seem to succeed while smart people get stuck/left behind:

http://motivationalsmartass.com/index.php/2010/04/why-stupid-people-succeed/

and Why morons sometimes win…

We all have heard people argue “oh, cream always floats to the top”. My counter argument to that one is “so does crap and corpses, given time”.

As with the changes that we're looking at leaves me with the Jay Leno "What the hell were you thinking?"

Monday, August 23, 2010

Probability of completing a Goal

According to the American Society of Training and Development, the probability of completing a goal is:

  • 10% when you hear a goal
  • 25% when you consciously decide to adopt it
  • 40% when you decide when you will do it
  • 50% when you make a plan of how you will do it
  • 65% when you commit to someone else that you will do it
  • 95% when you establish a specific accountability appointment

Monday, August 2, 2010

Invictus

Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll.
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

William Ernest Henley
(1849 - 1902 / Gloucester / England

Thursday, July 29, 2010

What Makes A Good Leader? 4 Essentials

From STPCON

Software Test Professionals asked the speakers who are presenting at the Software Test Professionals Conference & Expo 2010 in Las Vegas several questions about leadership. When asked about the top characteristics of strong leaders in the testing field, the conference speaker’s highlighted four main attributes they considered important.

1. Knowledge of the Business
Linda Hayes, Worksoft, Inc. founder states, “It’s important that leaders have a solid grasp of the business drivers and risks.” Often times, people focus on the process to manage a testing department and don’t have a grasp on the higher level business objectives. Leaders should have a deep understanding of the complex needs of the stakeholders including the customers, the organization and the team.

2. Communication & Interpersonal Relationship Skills
It’s not enough to simply have knowledge of the overall business. The ability to share this information with your team is also important. Jim Hazen, Consultant from Connected Testing stated “…listen and talk to people within and outside your group … you don’t have to be a diplomat but you do need to be able to convey information clearly.” A leader who is able to convey information clearly inside the testing department as well as outside and at all levels will serve as an information bridge to close the gaps of miscommunications and build the testing department’s value to the organization. Furthermore, clearly conveying information helps to motivate and support the testing team, create positive morale and provide a clear vision for success.

3. Knowledge of the Technical Skills
Robert Walsh, President of EnvisionWare, Inc. states that “Leaders must have a good balance between communication and technical skills.” With balance, a strong leader who understands the testing process, tools, systems and solutions can help guide team members without getting involved in the tactical aspects of the project. A leader’s ability to use this technical knowledge to be decisive and lead the team will inspire the team’s confidence in their leader.

4. Strategic Skills
Operating in environments with heavy workloads and not enough resources can challenge a senior leader in testing. It’s important to carefully organize resources to match priorities. In order to successfully allocate resources, a leader must have a clear focus on the testing department’s end goals and maintain a visual above the minefield. When a leader understands both human and technical resource allocation they can most effectively be open-minded to revolutionizing change for the betterment of the organization. Bradley Baird, Principal SQA Engineer at Symantec summarizes, “Just because we did it that way last time doesn’t mean we should do it that way this time. Be open to ideas on how to improve processes and procedures.” With an open mind, clear vision and the ability to effectively allocate resources, strategic leaders can drive change and lead their teams into the future.

Attend Software Test Professionals Conference & Expo 2010 – Where Test Leadership, Management & Strategy Converge – to learn more about the human side of testing, managing testers and the software test areas of the product development lifecycle. You will learn techniques for working effectively in a leadership role with test and non-test teams and the differences between being a manager and being a leader.

Five Reasons You're Not Getting Job Interviews


By Alesia Benedict, CPRW, JCTC GetInterviews.com

It's a tough market out there. Not only is unemployment high, but the regular flux of the market has stilled somewhat as people hang on to jobs and paychecks rather than seeking advancement or relocation. Don't make your job search any tougher than it needs to be. Evaluate your efforts to see if you've made any of the following mistakes.

1 – Your resume and cover letter are not written aggressively. Most people only capture job duties and responsibilities in their resumes. That's just not enough to gain attention in these tough market conditions. Your resume and cover letter must be written to grab the interest of the employer or recruiter, plus win high rankings in applicant tracking systems and online resume databases. A great resume is powerfully written with strong industry keywords; it details specific accomplishments and brings in measurements of performance wherever possible; and it is focused and relevant to the targeted position. A poorly written resume can be a significant hindrance in winning interviews.

2 – You are limiting your efforts to answering online job advertisements on fewer than ten job sites. Fishermen know when fishing is poor, they have to cast a wider net. The same goes for job search. If you are limiting your efforts to a few online job sites, you miss out on a majority of the market. A strong job search will include not only big job boards, but also networking, targeted communications, and creative career marketing. Don't ignore job boards but don't limit yourself to just online ads for your marketing efforts.

3 – You are not targeting specific companies first. Most jobs are never advertised anywhere. They are filled from within, filled from employee referrals, or filled from prospective candidates whose resumes are already in the company's database. If you are only chasing advertised positions, you are behind in the race right from the beginning. Generate a list of companies for which you would like to work and get your resume and cover letter to all of them. Build a consistent marketing campaign targeting these companies and build a knowledge base on their operations, their missions, challenges they face, and markets in which they operate. Use this information to market yourself to the needs of the company. In your communication, always speak to how you can be valuable to the company and how you can meet their needs.

4 – You ask your network if they know of any job openings. The question "Do you know of any open positions?" is a yes or no question. Once you get a "no" from your network contacts, you have exhausted your efforts, right? If you feel like you have a limited reach in your network, it is because you are asking the wrong question. You should be asking your network contacts for information about specific companies. As you work your network, you will build a significant knowledge base that will eventually lead to specific contacts within companies and give you insight that will be valuable in your marketing efforts. Asking for information instead of asking about open jobs also makes networking easier! You don't put your network contacts in the uncomfortable position of not being able to help. If you have ten different companies you are researching, more than likely your contact will be able to give you some kind of information on at least one of those companies. You actually make it easier for your network contacts to help you!

5 – You are not following up on your efforts. The squeaky wheel gets the oil. You must be a squeaky wheel. When employers get hundreds of applicants for a single opening, the five percent who take the trouble to follow up and keep following up will stand out in the crowd. You want to be in that five percent who rise above the masses. Sure, it's an extra step and it sometimes feels superfluous, but it is not wasted effort. You are not being a pest or bothersome. You are demonstrating you have an interest in the company and an ongoing interest in being considered for employment. Make some noise and be sure to follow up on your resume submissions.

Job search takes a lot of effort. With unemployment near double-digits, there are a lot of candidates in the market. The ones who get results are the ones who put forth the extra effort to conduct a smart, complete job search

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Seven Leadership Traits That The Gurus Don't Tell You

Repost from Bnet

July 26th, 2010 @ 3:26 am

Most leadership gurus tell you half the truth, at best, about what it takes to be a leader.

They will tell you about the need for vision, handling people, dealing with crises and all the other good stuff that makes up the corporate speaking circuit. Here are seven vital qualities you are less likely to hear them talk about:

  1. Sleeping on planes and dealing with jet lag. In any large organisation, a leader will spend a large amount of time on planes: I did 250,000 miles a year. The routine was simple: one glass of champagne and one melatonin pill forty minutes before take off, and I would be able to sleep all the way. Business class is not for fancy meals and watching movies: it is for work or sleep.
  2. Working in vehicles. If you can not work in taxis and cars, you will waste more time than you can afford. Staring out of the window mindlessly is not good.
  3. Dieting. Leaders are surrounded by biscuits, cookies and other corporate death food; and then there are the inevitable lunches, dinners and hotel breakfasts. Either learn to love the fruit, or start jogging. Or die early as an obese alcoholic. But to this day, some firms demand that you put your liver on the line: if you do not drink and entertain, you fail. Pick your diet to fit your firm.
  4. Ruthless time management: queues were invented to let leaders catch up with emails and phone calls; ditch or delegate everything you can; fix appointments around your diary, not around other people’s.
  5. Work the politics. Find the right assignments, right support and right mentors. Set expectations well. Negotiate budgets hard. Wake up to the reality of corporate life.
  6. Be ambitious, for your organisation and yourself. Stretch yourself and your team to achieve more than ever; keep on learning and growing. Don’t accept excuses, don’t be a victim: take responsibility.
  7. Learn to speak well. To small groups, to individuals and to large groups. As one tribal elder told me: “Words are like gods: words create whole new world’s in someone’s head. So use words well.” For many people, having a tooth extracted is less daunting than speaking in public. But it is a skill anyone can develop, with practice, over the years. And leaders must have this skill.

These seven qualities add up to a person who is pretty driven: they are often not comfortable people to be with. Not surprisingly, many people prefer to keep their humanity and their life than make the sacrifices to get to the top.

When I first started out, my boss told me: “one of the benefits of this job is that you will never suffer the rush hour. You will arrive before it and leave after it.” And if you keep that lifestyle going for ten to twenty years, you can reach the top. It was not a good choice, but at least it was a clear choice.

Choose well.

Friday, July 16, 2010

Posting using Graphics



Learning to use graphics in Posts - YinYang and
Captain America Emoticon

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Lessons for when you get it right and it still sucks

Highlight from BNET posting

For those times when you get it right and it sucks, remember these lessons:

  1. Not only can’t you control other people’s actions, but it’s not your job. Good managers and leaders know that.
  2. If you can feel empathy for everyone involved: those who got it wrong, those who suffered as a result, and for yourself, that’s a leadership quality.
  3. Learn from the experience because next time, the situation might be reversed, i.e. you might warn someone and be wrong, or somebody may warn you and be right.
  4. You’re not responsible for the failure of others unless they work for you, in which case you were a good leader by allowing them the opportunity to succeed or fail on their own.

Tightrope: Manage your time, and you'll manage just fine

Repost from USA Today

Do you remember school days when your teacher would write on your papers: "Does not use time wisely?" I sure do!

I would waste time talking to my classmates or on rainy days watching raindrops for patterns as they rolled down the windowpane. Or, some days would find me doodling on my notebook while I daydreamed of being a princess in some far off kingdom.

After writing those telling words in red on a weeks' worth of writing assignments, my third grade teacher, Mrs. Daly, told me that I was very intelligent and that I could use it to do and be anything I wanted to be. Or, she said, I could use that intelligence to continue wasting time, which would result in my becoming the oldest third grader in the history of education. The choice was mine. Of course having the desire to move from third to fourth grade made me choose the former.

Success eludes many because time isn't used wisely. There are people who live like they have 500 years of life left to live and so they waste precious time and don't reach their life dreams.

Recently a friend whom I will call Barb talked with me about her husband's employment situation. According to Barb, Harry is in a job beneath his skill and education. He is very talented, with a degree from Yale University. Barb says that he talks about starting his own consulting firm. He always says that he doesn't have time right now, but will definitely get to it. Yet he is able to find time to play long hours of chess with his friends and read all of the best-selling fiction as soon as it gets to the bookstore.

Barb says that deep down he wants to be an entrepreneur, but so far he has done nothing toward getting started.

Barb wanted any information that I could offer so that she could help her husband make a start toward his dream of having his own company.

There are many people like Harry who don't properly value their time. There are those among us who find plenty of ways to pass the hours and proceed to live like they have no time constraints at all. These are usually the folks who reach old age and feel like life has cheated them of living.

Some of the signs are: Taking jobs below your skill level, like Harry; spending time playing computer games; or, allowing friends to interrupt you with long useless telephone conversations.

A few months ago a woman I know told me that she had set a goal to complete 2,500 crossword puzzles that she had located on the Internet. At the time of our conversation she had managed to complete 750 of them in six months. She is a very talented photographer who is constantly complaining that she hasn't gotten a photo contract in weeks. When she's not figuring out crossword puzzles she's calling people on the phone just for a chat. At least that's the reason she said that she called me.

A good way for Harry or anyone to cure this problem is to be mindful of their day-to-day activities. Some folks move through the day in complete unawareness. They don't recall at the end of it what went on in their lives nor how it impacted them. Unless of course something earth-shattering happened. Setting small daily goals and making a point to reach them would help improve things.

As for my friend, she should encourage Harry to recognize the time-wasting trait in his personality. However, she must keep in mind that sometimes even the most intelligent person cannot easily take advice and must learn about life on their own. On the other hand, I told her that she could try giving him a nudge by helping him become more involved with people who are in business. This could be done by socializing with friends or getting Harry to join business networking groups.

In the meantime, is life delivering your business dreams and visions? Are you meeting both your short- and long-term goals? Or are you one of those people who needs someone to hand you a piece of paper with "Does not use time wisely" written across it?

Richard Branson's Top 5 Tips for Entrepreneurial Success

Repost Highlights from American Express OpenForum

While the current thinking in business schools holds that all someone with an idea needs to succeed are focus, clarity and a good business plan, I have found that bringing together a great team that’s united by strong motivation, determination and bravery is much more important. Let’s look at how to get started.

1. Find good people.

The successes of Virgin businesses such as Active, Atlantic, Money and Mobile were all based on our assembling a great management team that had a vision, passion and a real sense of ownership.

Specifically, we look for leaders who have the ability to listen to feedback from employees and customers – this is crucial to keeping a service or product fresh and innovative. Often, when things start going wrong, you’ll notice that the staff members feel they are being ignored and good ideas are not bubbling to the top.

Leaders should have the character to make tough decisions and the passion and ability to inspire their staff and carry them through difficult times. Our best CEOs tend to be unconcerned about the size of their office or the thickness of the carpet.

2. Realize that the employees are the business.

A successful business isn’t the product or service it sells, its supply chain or its corporate culture: It is a group of people bound together by a common purpose and vision. In Virgin’s case, we fly the same planes as our competitors and our gyms offer much of the same equipment as other gyms. What separates our businesses from the competition? Our employees.

The best designed business plan will come to nothing if it is not carried out by an enthusiastic and passionate staff. This is especially true when things go slightly wrong; a friendly and proactive team can often win people round, averting a potential disaster or even turning it to your benefit.

Earlier this year, a Virgin America flight was diverted from New York to an airport in nearby Connecticut due to bad weather. The passengers were stuck on the plane for many hours while the small airport struggled to cope with the huge number of extra planes. It took far too long.

Afterward, CEO David Cush himself called many of the passengers to apologize, which may have helped to give those customers a sense of all the Virgin staffers who had been worrying about them and working to fix the situation.

3. Always look for the best in your people. Lavish praise. Never criticize.

Rather than focusing on mistakes, a leader needs to catch someone doing something right every day. If this culture of fostering employee development through praise and recognition starts at the top, it will go far toward stamping out the employee fear of failure that can stunt a business, particularly in its early days.

When mistakes happen – which is inevitable – I always take the position that you have to learn from them and try not to dwell on what went wrong. It’s almost always better not to go over the obvious with the people involved. They know exactly what happened.

4. Don't take yourself too seriously.

We at Virgin pride ourselves on trying to find the fun in our businesses, by which I mean that we try to ensure that both our staff and customers feel a real sense of warmth and affection.

I have led from the front on this – dressing up in costumes, trying all manner of stunts (not all going 100 percent right!), and generally showing that I do not take myself too seriously. My approach will not work for all businesses, but keeping a sense of perspective and not allowing management to be seen as aloof will help keep your staff onside.

To foster employees’ sense of warm, personal interest in clients’ needs, it’s crucial to ensure that everyone who works with you enjoys what he or she is doing, which means that everyone must be proud of the company. This is vital to building lasting success and ensuring your service has an edge over the competition.

To find employees who will take such an interest in our customers, we look for people who show genuine enthusiasm and character. We have a bit of an advantage over our competitors, partly because of our brand and partly because our roots include having hired people to work in the music industry, and now aviation and space, all of which attract real enthusiasts.

5. Screw it, just do it.

Finally, to succeed in business, you must have the bravery to give it a go. Starting a business is a big risk; an entrepreneur needs resolve and conviction to overcome the early hurdles. Most start-ups fail in the first few years, so a key ingredient of success is the ability to pick yourself up and try again.

If it starts to look like your business is not going to make it, some on your team might start to lose courage. At that crucial time, your knowledge of the people factor may make or break your company. Let’s look at this aspect further next week.

Richard Branson

Founder of the Virgin Group (The Virgin Group)

Monday, July 12, 2010

Common misconceptions about job networking


Re-posted from a post at New Grad Life blog

I like the first myth example as representative of many people I've seem to met of late. Doesn't just apply to new college grads either.

Job Networking Myths for College Grads

Posted by: Kevin Cormac


Common misconceptions about job networking

Myth #1: Networking is simply getting a job because you know someone.

The following is not a likely scenario:

You: I know Darren - he's a big shot at Accenture. He said you'd give me a job.

Recruiting Director: Of course, I will. You're hired. We'll see you on Monday morning at 9:00. I'm assuming $200,000 will work for you as your new IT Specialist salary.

Sadly, that's not what networking is all about.

Networking is about tapping into connections you have to help you gain the opportunity to get a job. When they say that 66% of people get jobs through networking, it doesn't mean that 2/3 of people were handed their job because they happened to know someone. It means someone helped them get the interview or helped them get their resume noticed by HR.

When it's time to hire a candidate, recruiting directors are looking for some help. This is because the recruiting department is flooded with resumes. As a result, there's no way to interview all the qualified applicants. There might be sixty or seventy people in the pile of 500 resumes who could do the job, but it's tough to know who the best ones are.

If you are recommended by someone in the company, it doesn't mean you're guaranteed a job - or even an interview. However, the fact that you come "prescreened" by someone at the organization dramatically enhances your chance of getting that interview.

At smaller organizations, the situation can be similar. Without a dedicated recruiting department, usually someone at the company says, "Hey, we need a new receptionist. Does anyone know someone?"

In either scenario, having a connection is your key to landing a job.

Myth #2: You need to know some heavy hitter or the Director of HR to network.

In order to network, you simply need someone - anyone - in the company to pass your resume on to HR. It doesn't need to be an employee in the department that interests you, and it doesn't need to be a senior executive.

In fact, when I worked at Leo Burnett, I actually preferred recommendations from more junior employees. Let's be honest, the CEO's country club's friend's daughter's college roommate probably hasn't been vetted by the CEO. But the Account Executive's buddy, who has worked at a competitive agency, is probably a much better candidate.

Just make sure you find someone at the company to pass along your resume.

Myth #3: You need to know tons of connected people to network.

You may be surprised with how big your network is once you expand your perspective. In fact, you probably have more connections than you think for job networking. Just consider a few of these:

  • Your friends
  • Your parents
  • Your parents' friends
  • Your friends' parents
  • Your neighbors
  • Your dentist
  • Your hairstylist
  • Your personal trainer
  • Your old colleagues
  • Your old professors


If there's a company where you really want to land a job, make sure you start talking to anyone you know to find the connection. It's called six degrees of separation. Sure, you may not know anyone at Google, but does anyone you know know someone who works there?

Don't forget your college career center - even if you graduated years ago. At some schools, alumni organizations provide amazing resources and opportunities. Also, don't be shy about using LinkedIn or even Facebook to find contacts.



Networking Advice for the Shy Job Seeker

Networking Advice for the Shy Job Seeker
You can also read this in full on The Doostang Blog.

During a job search, individuals often distress over the fact that networking and asking people they know for career help can feel awkward. It's especially uncomfortable establishing contact with someone they don't know very well or haven't kept in great touch with. Our advice? Suck it up and play the game anyway.

The first thing you need to realize is that people enjoy helping others. When an individual receives a phone call or an email from someone asking for assistance, they often go out of their way to provide it because being asked makes them feel important and needed. The trick here is to be tactful in the way that you ask for help. Asking for career advice goes much farther than flat out asking for a job from someone you rarely talk to. Many job seekers are hesitant to reach out to their contacts because they do not want those people to feel like they are being used. The best way to make sure that your contacts don't feel that way is to always be gracious and request guidance instead of asking them to get you through the door straight away.

One way to avoid this conundrum in the first place is to sharpen your networking skills early on. Try to touch base with your contacts every so often, even if it's only once every other month. A quick email to say hello and catch up or a link to an article you feel they might find interesting is all it takes. If you stay in touch with people, you will feel much more at ease when you need to contact them to ask for help because you already speak with them on occasion, and they won't feel like you only come to them when you want something.

The job market is showing a bit more promise these days, but it's still tough out there. Our networks are extremely valuable in helping us gain leads and eventually land jobs. Branching out and asking for help doesn't come easily to everyone, but it is the way things are done. Don't let a little shyness hold you back.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Top searches from last 30 days from Google Trends.

First attempt at embedded table from Google Trends - Top Food & Beverage Searches in the US.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Drucker: What a manager does

Peter Drucker divided the job of the manager into five basic tasks:

1) Sets objectives. The manager sets goals for the group, and decides what work needs to be done to meet those goals.

2) Organizes. The manager divides the work into manageable activities, and selects people to accomplish the tasks that need to be done.

3) Motivates and communicates. The manager creates a team out of his people, through decisions on pay, placement, promotion, and through his communications with the team. Drucker also referred to this as the “integrating” function of the manager.

4) Measures. The manager establishes appropriate targets and yardsticks, and analyzes, appraises and interprets performance.

5) Develops people. With the rise of the knowledge worker, this task has taken on added importance. In a knowledge economy, people are the company’s most important asset, and it is up to the manager to develop that asset.

Four steps for creating a game plan

Taken from an article at Baseline Magazine.

Generic Four Steps for creating a good plan
Step 1: Write it down.
Step 2: Stop and think.
Step 3: Be logical.
Step 4: Stay committed.

Step 1: Write it down. The first step in creating any plan is simple. Yet most people never do: this first step. Write it down. If your plan is only in your head, it’s a thought and not a plan.

Thoughts have no real value until written down. Writing a plan accomplishes three things: It formalizes your thought process, creates confidence, and creates milestones, lists actions to take and results.

Step 2: Stop and think. Creating a plan, you are forced to stop and look at the desired results. You also need to focus on what activities are required to achieve those goals.

This focus and thought process are beneficial. They establish the framework in which to review what has works, what isn’t, and what you things need deeper thought. Taking a page from David Allen's Getting Things Done philosophy, your step may be at too high a level and need to be decomposed to the "next action".

Creating a plan makes the planner more confident and motivated to take action. Taking action is critical but it also gives a framework for that action.

Step 3: Be logical. A plan should not be simply a dream - that is aspirational goal. Many business consultants and leaders advocate making a plan realistic. Some believe this a guaranteed way to limit one’s success. Realistic is a poor measure if it’s limited by the past and provides a rationalization for failing to reach your goal.

Activities and goals should be logical as well as than "realistic". If you are planning a driving vacation trip starting in Washington, D.C. you wouldn't plan a sequence of first going to Chicago, then to Philadelphia, then to St. Louis, then Dallas then back home!

Step 4: Stay committed. So many people have great ideas and intentions, but fall short when executing and maintaining a plan. Watch out for the “Power of New” syndrome, which an individual or group is excited about new programs, starts strong and then fails to complete as they get distracted by the next new thing"

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Kathy Sierra at Business of Software 2009

While looking for some Web 2.0 stuff, I wandered across this link to Kathy Sierra's talk at Business of Software 2009. It is something that I wasn't expecting, but it was inspiring for programmer's and those of us who are trying to lead programmers in a corporate setting to do something better.